Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security

Fourth Circuit

Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security

585 F. App'x 166

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 10, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1453

StatusPublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 166 (Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security, 585 F. App'x 166 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher L. Carter appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom[167]*167mendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Commissioner in this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying Carter’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Comm’r Soc. Sec., No. 3:13-cv-00299-REP, 2014 WL 850685 (E.D.Va. Mar. 4, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher L. Carter appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom[167]*167mendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Commissioner in this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying Carter’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Comm’r Soc. Sec., No. 3:13-cv-00299-REP, 2014 WL 850685 (E.D.Va. Mar. 4, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 F. App'x 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ca4-2014.