Carter v. Commercial Credit Co.
This text of 198 S.E. 792 (Carter v. Commercial Credit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. On the trial of an issue formed by the filing of an affidavit of illegality to the foreclosure of a retention-of-title or conditional-sale contract, where it appeared from the evidence that the defendant did not tender to the sheriff the amount appearing to be due without contest and not denied in the affidavit, it was not error for the court to dismiss the affidavit of illegality on motion of the plaintiff. Code, § 67-2401(7).
2. It is not necessary to the validity of a levy in the foreclosure of a retention-of-title contract for the owner thereof to execute and record a bill of sale to the property involved. Macon Savings Bank v. Jones Motor Co., 168 Ga. 805 (2) (149 S. E. 217); Cobb v. Growers Finance Corporation, 40 Ga. App. 442 (2) (149 S. E. 920) ; Jackson v. Parks, 49 Ga. App. 29, 30 (174 S. E. 203).
3. Whether such a contract is properly attested is immaterial between the original parties or between the maker and a transferee. Futch v. Taylor, 22 Ga. App. 441 (96 S. E. 183); Code, § 67-1305.
4. The court did not err in dismissing the affidavit of illegality, and in rendering judgment,for the plaintiff transferee.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 S.E. 792, 58 Ga. App. 470, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-commercial-credit-co-gactapp-1938.