Carter v. City of Orlando

225 So. 2d 169, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5399
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 1969·No. No. 2298·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a thorough review of the briefs and record in this cause, it is our opinion that the final judgment from which this appeal was taken should be affirmed on the authority of: County of Brevard v. Woodham, Fla.App.1969, 223 So.2d 344; McCormick v. City of Pensacola, Fla.App. 1968, 216 So.2d 785; City of Miami Beach v. Lachman, Fla.1953, 71 So.2d 148; City of Miami v. Zorovich, Fla.App.1967, 195 So.2d 31 (cert. den. Fla.1967, 201 So.2d 554); and City of St. Petersburg v. Aikin, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 315.

[170]*170We reject the appellee’s contention that Ch. 67-1833, Laws of Florida, Special Acts, 1967, provides the sole means whereby the constitutional validity of an Orlando zoning ordinance may be subjected to judicial review. See Harris v. Goff, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 642, and 30 Fla.Jur., Statutes, § 106.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and REED, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. City of Orlando, 225 So. 2d 169, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5399 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

225 So. 2d 169 (Carter v. City of Orlando) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zukowski v. City of Casselberry
244 So. 2d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)