Carter v. Carter
This text of 36 Tex. 693 (Carter v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant filed in the court below his petition for intervention, setting up a claim to two bales of cotton levied upon as the property of Henry Carter.
On motion, his prayer for intervention was stricken out by the court, because the same was not sworn to as prescribed by the statute, and because the same was not accompanied by a bond, as required in such cases, and he has appealed. We see no error in the ruling of the court, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 Tex. 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-carter-tex-1872.