Carter v. Carter

36 Tex. 693

Opinion

Ogden, J.

The appellant filed in the court below his petition for intervention, setting up a claim to two bales of cotton levied upon as the property of Henry Carter.

On motion, his prayer for intervention was stricken out by the court, because the same was not sworn to as prescribed by the statute, and because the same was not accompanied by a bond, as required in such cases, and he has appealed. We see no error in the ruling of the court, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.