Carter v. Carter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carter v. Carter

265 A.D.2d 520, 697 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10833

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 25, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated October 25, 1996, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated April 6, 1999, which denied his motion, inter alia, to modify the judgment of divorce by directing that the defendant’s 40 IK plan be divided between the parties as of January 15, 1994, instead of January 3, 1994.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A separation agreement, which, as here, does not merge into thé judgment of divorce, survives as a separate contract to which the parties are bound (see, Riley v Riley, 179 AD2d 750; Lambert v Lambert, 142 AD2d 557). Consequently, while a judgment of divorce may be attacked pursuant to CPLR 5105, the underlying separation agreement will remain unimpeached unless challenged in a plenary action (see, Riley v Riley, supra; Culp v Culp, 117 AD2d 700). The failure of the defendant to commence a plenary action is fatal to his application. S. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated October 25, 1996, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated April 6, 1999, which denied his motion, inter alia, to modify the judgment of divorce by directing that the defendant’s 40 IK plan be divided between the parties as of January 15, 1994, instead of January 3, 1994.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A separation agreement, which, as here, does not merge into thé judgment of divorce, survives as a separate contract to which the parties are bound (see, Riley v Riley, 179 AD2d 750; Lambert v Lambert, 142 AD2d 557). Consequently, while a judgment of divorce may be attacked pursuant to CPLR 5105, the underlying separation agreement will remain unimpeached unless challenged in a plenary action (see, Riley v Riley, supra; Culp v Culp, 117 AD2d 700). The failure of the defendant to commence a plenary action is fatal to his application. S. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Carter v. Carter, 265 A.D.2d 520, 697 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

265 A.D.2d 520 (Carter v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related