Carter v. Brunswick & Western Railroad

42 S.E. 239, 115 Ga. 853, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 626
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 18, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 42 S.E. 239 (Carter v. Brunswick & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Brunswick & Western Railroad, 42 S.E. 239, 115 Ga. 853, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 626 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Iuttle, J.

1. As to the questions of law raised in the present record, save that dealt with in the next headnote, this case is controlled hy the decision of this court in the case of Petty v. B. & W. R. R. Co., 109 Ga. 666.

.2. A stipulation manifestly designed for the benefit of the company, to the effect that a beneficiary would not be paid under the relief and hospital system unless the employee first filed with the proper officers of this department satisfactory releases, does not authorize one who has received benefits at'the hands of this department in accordance with his terms of membership therein, to prosecute his claim -for damages merely because he has failed or refused to execute such a release.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
72 S.E. 801 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
Barden v. Atlantic Coast Line Railway Co.
152 N.C. 318 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Beazley
54 Fla. 311 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 S.E. 239, 115 Ga. 853, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-brunswick-western-railroad-ga-1902.