Carter v. Brett

42 S.E. 348, 116 Ga. 114, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 39
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 8, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 42 S.E. 348 (Carter v. Brett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Brett, 42 S.E. 348, 116 Ga. 114, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 39 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Eisii, J.

1. Where a father relinquishes the custody and control of his minor child to another, the latter, if a suitable and proper person to have such custody and control, is legally entitled thereto.

2. It is, on the hearing of a writ of habeas corpus, an improper exercise of discretion to render a judgment depriving one legally entitled to the custody of a minor child of the same and awarding such custody to another, when there is undisputed evidence showing the right and fitness of the former to have such custody, and no evidence to the contrary.

Submitted June 27, Decided August 8, 1902. Habeas corpus — certiorari. Before Judge Roberts. Irwin superior court. March 11, 1902. W. W. Bennett, for plaintiff.

3. It results from the application of what is laid down above to the present case, that the court erred m not sustaining the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J.-, absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of A. M. Y.
377 S.E.2d 893 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
In re M. A. F.
334 S.E.2d 668 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1985)
In Re MAF
334 S.E.2d 668 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1985)
Queen v. Ballew
142 S.E.2d 841 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Perkins v. Courson
135 S.E.2d 388 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Tenney v. Tenney
104 S.E.2d 119 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Parker v. Parker
97 S.E.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Hill v. Rivers
37 S.E.2d 386 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Beavers v. Williams
33 S.E.2d 343 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Morris v. Grant
27 S.E.2d 295 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Shope v. Singleton
27 S.E.2d 26 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Fortson v. Fortson
25 S.E.2d 518 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Chapin v. Cummings
12 S.E.2d 312 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Saxon v. Brantley
163 S.E. 504 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Carswell, Moxley & Son v. Harrison
126 S.E. 293 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Stanford v. Gray
129 P. 423 (Utah Supreme Court, 1912)
Eaves v. Fears
64 S.E. 269 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Sloan v. Jones
62 S.E. 21 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Southern Railway Co. v. Flemister
48 S.E. 160 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 S.E. 348, 116 Ga. 114, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-brett-ga-1902.