Carter v. Berberian

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Carter v. Berberian

570 A.2d 1102, 1990 R.I. LEXIS 35, 1990 WL 17824

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedFebruary 22, 1990

DocketNo. 90-112-M.P.

StatusPublished

This text of 570 A.2d 1102 (Carter v. Berberian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. Berberian, 570 A.2d 1102, 1990 R.I. LEXIS 35, 1990 WL 17824 (R.I. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On January 4, 1990 this Court directed Respondent to appear at our conference on February 22, 1990 at 9:30 a.m. to show cause why he should not be disciplined as the result of findings by this Court’s Disciplinary Board in four (4) Disciplinary complaints. Respondent’s Petition for Reinstatement is pending before the Court. Respondent failed to appear as directed and Counsel for Respondent appeared and represented to us that Respondent has no cause to show and was unable to explain Respondent’s absence. We are of the opinion that for Respondent’s failure to appear, his Petition for Reinstatement should be denied.

Accordingly, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the petition of Aram K. Berbe-rian for reinstatement to the practice of law in this State is hereby denied.

MURRAY, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On January 4, 1990 this Court directed Respondent to appear at our conference on February 22, 1990 at 9:30 a.m. to show cause why he should not be disciplined as the result of findings by this Court’s Disciplinary Board in four (4) Disciplinary complaints. Respondent’s Petition for Reinstatement is pending before the Court. Respondent failed to appear as directed and Counsel for Respondent appeared and represented to us that Respondent has no cause to show and was unable to explain Respondent’s absence. We are of the opinion that for Respondent’s failure to appear, his Petition for Reinstatement should be denied.

Accordingly, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the petition of Aram K. Berbe-rian for reinstatement to the practice of law in this State is hereby denied.

MURRAY, J., did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

570 A.2d 1102, 1990 R.I. LEXIS 35, 1990 WL 17824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-berberian-ri-1990.