Carter v. Baltimore City Police Department

598 F. App'x 860
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2015·No. No. 14-2059·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles H. Carter appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Carter’s motion, which was construed as a motion for contempt in relation to a settlement agreement that the court had previously approved. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carter v. Baltimore City Police Dep’t, No. 1:04-cv-03842-WDQ, 2014 WL 4662339 (D.Md. Sept. 16, 2014). We grant Carter leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. Baltimore City Police Department, 598 F. App'x 860 (4th Cir. 2015).

598 F. App'x 860 (Carter v. Baltimore City Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related