Carter v. Atlanta Life Insurance

171 S.E. 729, 47 Ga. App. 838, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 687
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 11, 1933
Docket23309
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 171 S.E. 729 (Carter v. Atlanta Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. Atlanta Life Insurance, 171 S.E. 729, 47 Ga. App. 838, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 687 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The several excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of in the motion for a new trial, when considered in the light of the remainder of the charge and the facts of the case, show no error.

2. The two grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of the failure of the court to give certain instructions (not requested in writing) to the jury, show no cause for a reversal of the judgment, as those portions of the instructions which were applicable to the facts of the case were sufficiently covered by the charge given. The charge fully and fairly presented to the jury the issues in the case and the contentions of both parties.

3. The verdict was amply authorized, if not demanded, by the evidence; and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watkins v. City of Dothan
109 So. 2d 671 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Ex Parte Watkins
109 So. 2d 671 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 S.E. 729, 47 Ga. App. 838, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-atlanta-life-insurance-gactapp-1933.