Carter v. American Ginger Ale & Carbonating Co.
54 S.E. 755, 125 Ga. 819, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 290
Opinion
I. “When several persons are named in a bill of exceptions as defendants in error, an acknowledgment of service thereon, signed by an attorney ‘for’ one of these persons by name ‘et al.,’ affords no evidence of service of the bill upon the others or any one or more of them.” Mutual Building Co. v. Dickinson, 112 Ga. 469.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carter v. American Ginger Ale & Carbonating Co., 54 S.E. 755, 125 Ga. 819, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 290 (Ga. 1906).
54 S.E. 755 (Carter v. American Ginger Ale & Carbonating Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crosby v. Thomas
146 S.E. 191 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)