Carter H. Ogden, Zelma Ogden and Dorothy Ogden v. United States of America, E. B. Ogden, Jr. And Nancy A. Ogden v. United States
This text of 555 F.2d 134 (Carter H. Ogden, Zelma Ogden and Dorothy Ogden v. United States of America, E. B. Ogden, Jr. And Nancy A. Ogden v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction the taxpayers’ actions for refund of income taxes alleged to be due by virtue of deductions claimed for certain losses resulting from expropriation of their property by the Cuban government. See Ogden et al. v. United States, S.D.Miss. 1977, 432 F.Supp. 214. 1
Perusal of the record and the briefs of the parties, followed by oral argument, persuades us that the trial court correctly determined that the claims for refund were time-barred under Section 165 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 165.
AFFIRMED.
. The district court’s opinion and order of dismissal are also reported at 37 A.F.T.R.2d 409.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 F.2d 134, 40 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-h-ogden-zelma-ogden-and-dorothy-ogden-v-united-states-of-america-ca5-1977.