Carter H. Ogden, Zelma Ogden and Dorothy Ogden v. United States of America, E. B. Ogden, Jr. And Nancy A. Ogden v. United States

555 F.2d 134, 40 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 77
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 1, 1977·No. 76-1155·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction the taxpayers’ actions for refund of income taxes alleged to be due by virtue of deductions claimed for certain losses resulting from expropriation of their property by the Cuban government. See Ogden et al. v. United States, S.D.Miss. 1977, 432 F.Supp. 214. 1

Perusal of the record and the briefs of the parties, followed by oral argument, persuades us that the trial court correctly determined that the claims for refund were time-barred under Section 165 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 165.

AFFIRMED.

1

. The district court’s opinion and order of dismissal are also reported at 37 A.F.T.R.2d 409.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter H. Ogden, Zelma Ogden and Dorothy Ogden v. United States of America, E. B. Ogden, Jr. And Nancy A. Ogden v. United States, 555 F.2d 134, 40 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 77 (5th Cir. 1977).

555 F.2d 134 (Carter H. Ogden, Zelma Ogden and Dorothy Ogden v. United States of America, E. B. Ogden, Jr. And Nancy A. Ogden v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Can Corp. v. United States
520 F. Supp. 567 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)
Powell v. Kopman
511 F. Supp. 700 (S.D. New York, 1981)
Baral v. Commissioner
1978 T.C. Memo. 383 (U.S. Tax Court, 1978)