Carter, Edward Lee
This text of Carter, Edward Lee (Carter, Edward Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-84,620-01
EX PARTE EDWARD LEE CARTER, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2011CR1674-W1 IN THE 144TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY
Per curiam. Yeary, J., not participating.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of
aggravated sexual assault of a child and three counts of indecency with a child, and was sentenced
to consecutive eleven-year and five-year sentences for the two aggravated sexual assault counts, and
three concurrent two-year sentences for the indecency with a child counts. The Fourth Court of
Appeals affirmed his conviction. Carter v. State, No. 04-13-00532-CR (Tex. App. — San Antonio,
November 12, 2014) (not designated for publication). 2
Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel
failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of
his right to petition pro se for discretionary review.
Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. In addition, the trial court has
obtained an affidavit from the Program Supervisor of the Mail Systems Coordinators Panel from
TDCJ. Based on those affidavits, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law
that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and
failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court
recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition
for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 04-13-00532-
CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 2011CR1674 from the 144th District Court of Bexar
County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of
the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.
Delivered: March 9, 2016 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carter, Edward Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-edward-lee-texcrimapp-2016.