Carter Coal Co. v. Anchor Block Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Carter Coal Co. v. Anchor Block Coal Co.

38 S.W.2d 446, 238 Ky. 561, 1931 Ky. LEXIS 280

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

DecidedApril 28, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 38 S.W.2d 446 (Carter Coal Co. v. Anchor Block Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter Coal Co. v. Anchor Block Coal Co., 38 S.W.2d 446, 238 Ky. 561, 1931 Ky. LEXIS 280 (Ky. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

overruling motion for appeal and affirming.

Judgment is for less than $500, and motion for an appeal. The contract of appellee to pay the involved taxes is construed to be prospective in its language, and the evidence introduced, if it could be considered by this court (but which it cannot, since there is no bill of exceptions incorporating it), does not show to the contrary, but rather confirms that construction.

Motion for appeal is therefore overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam

overruling motion for appeal and affirming.

Judgment is for less than $500, and motion for an appeal. The contract of appellee to pay the involved taxes is construed to be prospective in its language, and the evidence introduced, if it could be considered by this court (but which it cannot, since there is no bill of exceptions incorporating it), does not show to the contrary, but rather confirms that construction.

Motion for appeal is therefore overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 S.W.2d 446, 238 Ky. 561, 1931 Ky. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-coal-co-v-anchor-block-coal-co-kyctapphigh-1931.