Carter & Co. v. Coston

71 S.E. 764, 9 Ga. App. 493, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 200
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 29, 1911·No. 3296·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Powell, J1

The plaintiff sued upon an account aggregating $151.75, on which two items, amounting to $75.19, were credited. The defendant answered, denying the allegations of the petition, and further asserting that his account with the plaintiff for the time in question was only $75, and that he had given his note for that sum, and had paid it through the payments credited on the account. , Eeld, that the suit was an action to recover only the excess of the account claimed after deducting the conceded payments; that the defendant’s answer was not a plea of payment, was not an affirmative plea at all, but was merely a denial that the alleged indebtedness sued on ever existed; and that the court did not err in ruling that the burden of proof rested upon the plaintiff. ’ Judgment affirmed.

W. G. Martin, for plaintiffs. Beazley & Eagan, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter & Co. v. Coston, 71 S.E. 764, 9 Ga. App. 493, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 200 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

71 S.E. 764 (Carter & Co. v. Coston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Babb v. Kersh
88 S.E.2d 432 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Williams v. McNally
270 P. 411 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1928)