Carter, C., Pets. v. Chapman, L.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 2, 2022·No. 7 MM 2022·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

CAROL ANN CARTER, MONICA : No. 7 MM 2022 PARRILLA, REBECCA POYOUROW, : WILLIAM TUNG, ROSEANNE MILAZZO, : BURT SIEGEL, SUSAN CASSANELLI, LEE : CASSANELLI, LYNN WACHMAN, MICHAEL : GUTTMAN, MAYA FONKEU, BRADY HILL, : MARY ELLEN BALCHUNIS, TOM DEWALL, : STEPHANIE MCNULTY AND JANET : TEMIN, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : LEIGH M. CHAPMAN, IN HER OFFICIAL : CAPACITY AS THE ACTING SECRETARY : OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA; JESSICA MATHIS, IN : HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR : FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF : ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES, : : Respondents :

DISSENTING STATEMENT

JUSTICE MUNDY FILED: February 2, 2022

Given the Commonwealth Court's February 1, 2022 clarifying order confirming the

filing of its decision and opinion within the next 48 hours, and with time being of the

essence, I would favor regularity in the appellate proceedings, which can be expedited,

as opposed to exercising this Court’s extraordinary jurisdiction at this juncture.

Justice Brobson joins this dissenting statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter, C., Pets. v. Chapman, L., (Pa. 2022).

Carter, C., Pets. v. Chapman, L. (Carter, C., Pets. v. Chapman, L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.