Carter, C., Pets. v. Chapman, L.
This text of Carter, C., Pets. v. Chapman, L. (Carter, C., Pets. v. Chapman, L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
CAROL ANN CARTER, MONICA : No. 7 MM 2022 PARRILLA, REBECCA POYOUROW, : WILLIAM TUNG, ROSEANNE MILAZZO, : BURT SIEGEL, SUSAN CASSANELLI, LEE : CASSANELLI, LYNN WACHMAN, MICHAEL : GUTTMAN, MAYA FONKEU, BRADY HILL, : MARY ELLEN BALCHUNIS, TOM DEWALL, : STEPHANIE MCNULTY AND JANET : TEMIN, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : LEIGH M. CHAPMAN, IN HER OFFICIAL : CAPACITY AS THE ACTING SECRETARY : OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA; JESSICA MATHIS, IN : HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR : FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF : ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES, : : Respondents :
DISSENTING STATEMENT
JUSTICE MUNDY FILED: February 2, 2022
Given the Commonwealth Court's February 1, 2022 clarifying order confirming the
filing of its decision and opinion within the next 48 hours, and with time being of the
essence, I would favor regularity in the appellate proceedings, which can be expedited,
as opposed to exercising this Court’s extraordinary jurisdiction at this juncture.
Justice Brobson joins this dissenting statement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carter, C., Pets. v. Chapman, L., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-c-pets-v-chapman-l-pa-2022.