Carter Bros. v. Younger Bros.
This text of 2 Posey 445 (Carter Bros. v. Younger Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion.— Plaintiffs set forth in their affidavit two causes for attachment, which are not only distinct, but inconsistent; both cannot be true.
If the defendants had disposed of their property it was beyond their reach; hence they could not convert it into money in order to defraud their creditors. This affidavit is similar to the one in Dunnenbaum v. Schram, 59 Tex., 281.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Posey 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-bros-v-younger-bros-texcommnapp-1882.