Cartel Demarcus Granison v. State of Florida
This text of Cartel Demarcus Granison v. State of Florida (Cartel Demarcus Granison v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA ________________________________
Case No. 5D2024-1690 LT Case No. 2020-CF-360-A ________________________________
CARTEL DEMARCUS GRANISON,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _______________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Timothy McCourt, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Judson Searcy, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
John M. Guard, Acting Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Alexander Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
January 31, 2025
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders 1 appeal, after careful review of the record, we affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences on all counts and in
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). all respects, except as to the $50.00 cost of prosecution for the misdemeanor count imposed in the written judgment.
The trial court imposed the minimum per case cost of prosecution in the amount of $50.00 for the misdemeanor count and $100.00 for the felony counts. See § 938.27(8), Fla. Stat. (2024). Section 938.27(8) states that the minimum cost is set per case based on whether a misdemeanor or a felony has been charged. Notably, the minimum costs are “per case,” not per charge. The State did not request the cost of prosecution, and the trial court did not pronounce this cost.
Accordingly, Appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed, and the assessment of $100.00 as the cost of prosecution because there was a felony charge in the case is affirmed. The additional assessment of $50.00 as the cost of prosecution for the misdemeanor count is reversed, and the matter is remanded for entry of an amended judgment.
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED for entry of an amended judgment.
EDWARDS, C.J., and SOUD and MACIVER, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cartel Demarcus Granison v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cartel-demarcus-granison-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.