Cartagena v. Girandola

104 A.D.3d 599, 960 N.Y.S.2d 901
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 26, 2013·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered January 30, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action for personal injuries, plaintiff established her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability. She testified, without contradiction, that while crossing the street in the crosswalk, with the light in her favor and after looking for oncoming traffic, defendant’s truck struck her while [600]*600making a left turn. Defendant failed to raise an issue of fact as to plaintiffs comparative negligence. Concur — Friedman, J.E, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Richter and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cartagena v. Girandola, 104 A.D.3d 599, 960 N.Y.S.2d 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

104 A.D.3d 599 (Cartagena v. Girandola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Traorey v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 03152 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Garzon-Victoria v. Okolo
116 A.D.3d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)