Cartafalsa v. Power

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cartafalsa v. Power

34 A.D.2d 974, 313 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4537

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 974 (Cartafalsa v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cartafalsa v. Power, 34 A.D.2d 974, 313 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4537 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding inter alia to invalidate petitions designating respondents Anthony Saieva and Rosalie De Lillio as candidates in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on June 23,1970 for the Party position of Member of the State Committee, Male and Female respectively, for the 36th Assembly District, Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 9, 1970, which declared said designating petitions invalid and enjoined the respondent Board of Elections from placing the names of said designees-respondents upon the ballot, but did not grant the further relief sought in the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding inter alia to invalidate petitions designating respondents Anthony Saieva and Rosalie De Lillio as candidates in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on June 23,1970 for the Party position of Member of the State Committee, Male and Female respectively, for the 36th Assembly District, Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 9, 1970, which declared said designating petitions invalid and enjoined the respondent Board of Elections from placing the names of said designees-respondents upon the ballot, but did not grant the further relief sought in the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 974, 313 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cartafalsa-v-power-nyappdiv-1970.