Carswell v. State

112 S.E. 652, 28 Ga. App. 624, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 729
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 13, 1922·No. 13375·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

A direct bill of exceptions will not lie to a judgment overruling a plea in abatement in a criminal case. This is true although the necessary effect of a judgment sustaining the plea would be to entitle the defendant to a judgment dismissing the prosecution. See, in this connection, English v. Rosenkrantz, 150 Ga. 745 (105 S. [625] E. 292), and citations; Bashinski v. State, 123 Ga. 508 (2), 510 (51 S. E. 499). The writ of error in this case must be

Decided June 13, 1922. Conviction of stabbing; from city court of Americus — Judge Harper. February 1, 1922. J. A. Hixon, for plaintiff in error. T. O. Marshall, solicitor pro tern., Shipp & Sheppard, contra.

Dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carswell v. State, 112 S.E. 652, 28 Ga. App. 624, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 729 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

112 S.E. 652 (Carswell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitus v. State
117 Ga. App. 359 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)