Carswell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Carswell v. State

112 S.E. 652, 28 Ga. App. 624, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 729

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 13, 1922

Docket13375

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 S.E. 652 (Carswell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carswell v. State, 112 S.E. 652, 28 Ga. App. 624, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 729 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

A direct bill of exceptions will not lie to a judgment overruling a plea in abatement in a criminal case. This is true although the necessary effect of a judgment sustaining the plea would be to entitle the defendant to a judgment dismissing the prosecution. See, in this connection, English v. Rosenkrantz, 150 Ga. 745 (105 S. [625]*625E. 292), and citations; Bashinski v. State, 123 Ga. 508 (2), 510 (51 S. E. 499). The writ of error in this case must be

Decided June 13, 1922.

Conviction of stabbing; from city court of Americus — Judge Harper. February 1, 1922.

J. A. Hixon, for plaintiff in error. T. O. Marshall, solicitor pro tern., Shipp & Sheppard, contra.

Dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI