Carswell v. State

801 So. 2d 301, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17647, 2001 WL 1589503
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carswell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6725
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 2001·No. No. 2D00-4094·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

The circuit court revoked Darron Cars-well’s probation based on his violations of numerous conditions. Carswell claims the evidence was insufficient to support the revocation. We affirm the court’s conclusion that Carswell willfully violated conditions 3, 9, A and I. However, the evidence failed to prove violations of two of the conditions recited in the revocation order: that Carswell failed to perform required community service hours (condition M) and that he committed a new law violation (condition 5). We reverse the order as it relates to these two conditions and remand for the circuit court to enter a new order.

Probation revocation affirmed, remanded with directions to enter a new order.

BLUE, C.J., and RAMSBERGER, PETER M., Associate Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carswell v. State, 801 So. 2d 301, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17647, 2001 WL 1589503 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

801 So. 2d 301 (Carswell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.