Carswell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carswell v. State

801 So. 2d 301, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17647, 2001 WL 1589503

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 14, 2001

DocketNo. 2D00-4094

StatusPublished

This text of 801 So. 2d 301 (Carswell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carswell v. State, 801 So. 2d 301, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17647, 2001 WL 1589503 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

The circuit court revoked Darron Cars-well’s probation based on his violations of numerous conditions. Carswell claims the evidence was insufficient to support the revocation. We affirm the court’s conclusion that Carswell willfully violated conditions 3, 9, A and I. However, the evidence failed to prove violations of two of the conditions recited in the revocation order: that Carswell failed to perform required community service hours (condition M) and that he committed a new law violation (condition 5). We reverse the order as it relates to these two conditions and remand for the circuit court to enter a new order.

Probation revocation affirmed, remanded with directions to enter a new order.

BLUE, C.J., and RAMSBERGER, PETER M., Associate Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

The circuit court revoked Darron Cars-well’s probation based on his violations of numerous conditions. Carswell claims the evidence was insufficient to support the revocation. We affirm the court’s conclusion that Carswell willfully violated conditions 3, 9, A and I. However, the evidence failed to prove violations of two of the conditions recited in the revocation order: that Carswell failed to perform required community service hours (condition M) and that he committed a new law violation (condition 5). We reverse the order as it relates to these two conditions and remand for the circuit court to enter a new order.

Probation revocation affirmed, remanded with directions to enter a new order.

BLUE, C.J., and RAMSBERGER, PETER M., Associate Judge, Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

801 So. 2d 301, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17647, 2001 WL 1589503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carswell-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.