Carswell v. Mayor of Waynesboro

85 S.E. 676, 16 Ga. App. 483, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 96
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 25, 1915
Docket6127
StatusPublished

This text of 85 S.E. 676 (Carswell v. Mayor of Waynesboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carswell v. Mayor of Waynesboro, 85 S.E. 676, 16 Ga. App. 483, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 96 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

A general assignment of error in a petition for certiorari that the municipal court erred in rendering the judgment of which complaint is made, without more, is insufficient to present the point that the municipal ordinance under which the petitioner was convicted was void because the municipality, without express legislative authority, bad assumed to penalize an act already made an offense by the laws of the State. There being no other assignment of error, the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Certiorari; from Burke superior court — Judge Sheppard presiding. October 6, 1914.. G. B. Garlick, for plaintiff in error. H. J. Fullbright, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 S.E. 676, 16 Ga. App. 483, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carswell-v-mayor-of-waynesboro-gactapp-1915.