Carsten Quinlan v. Daniel Puls

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 25-2155 ___________________________

Carsten J. Quinlan

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Daniel Puls; Cheryl Puls; Alissa Puls

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: November 5, 2025 Filed: November 10, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Carsten Quinlan appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se civil action for failure to state a claim. After careful review of the record, we find no basis for reversal. See Federer v. Gephardt, 363 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Douglas L. Micko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-