Carsten Hedemann v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 8, 2019·No. 05-18-00247-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered November 8, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00247-CR

CARSTEN HEDEMANN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1434917-R

ORDER We reinstate this appeal. Appellant’s N o v e m b e r 7 , 2019 S e c o n d Motion for

Continuance of Evidentiary Hearing is GRANTED. Accordingly the scheduling for this

remanded proceeding is revised as follows:

We abate this appeal and ORDER the trial court (1) to conduct an evidentiary hearing on

appellant’s motion for new trial at the court’s earliest convenience after D e c e m b e r 1 1 ,

2 019, (2) to make written findings explaining its ruling on that motion, and (3) to arrange for its

ruling and findings to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record filed within two weeks of the

date of the hearing. We ORDER a reporter’s record from the hearing on the motion for new trial to be filed

within two weeks of the date of the hearing.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Gary

Stephens, Judge of Dallas County’s Auxiliary Court No. 8, and to the parties. The parties are

instructed going forward that any motion filed during the abatement must include a certificate of

conference.

The appeal will be reinstated two weeks after the date of the hearing or when the

supplemental clerk’s record and reporter’s record are filed, whichever occurs sooner.

/Bill Pedersen, III/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carsten Hedemann v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Carsten Hedemann v. State (Carsten Hedemann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.