Carsten Hedemann v. State
Opinion
Order entered November 8, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00247-CR
CARSTEN HEDEMANN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1434917-R
ORDER We reinstate this appeal. Appellant’s N o v e m b e r 7 , 2019 S e c o n d Motion for
Continuance of Evidentiary Hearing is GRANTED. Accordingly the scheduling for this
remanded proceeding is revised as follows:
We abate this appeal and ORDER the trial court (1) to conduct an evidentiary hearing on
appellant’s motion for new trial at the court’s earliest convenience after D e c e m b e r 1 1 ,
2 019, (2) to make written findings explaining its ruling on that motion, and (3) to arrange for its
ruling and findings to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record filed within two weeks of the
date of the hearing. We ORDER a reporter’s record from the hearing on the motion for new trial to be filed
within two weeks of the date of the hearing.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Gary
Stephens, Judge of Dallas County’s Auxiliary Court No. 8, and to the parties. The parties are
instructed going forward that any motion filed during the abatement must include a certificate of
conference.
The appeal will be reinstated two weeks after the date of the hearing or when the
supplemental clerk’s record and reporter’s record are filed, whichever occurs sooner.
/Bill Pedersen, III/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carsten Hedemann v. State (Carsten Hedemann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.