Carstarphen v. Town of Plymouth

118 S.E. 905, 186 N.C. 90, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 182
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 19, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 118 S.E. 905 (Carstarphen v. Town of Plymouth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carstarphen v. Town of Plymouth, 118 S.E. 905, 186 N.C. 90, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 182 (N.C. 1923).

Opinion

ClaeksoN, J.

“Every person owning property is required to list, and shall make out, sign, and deliver to tbe list-taker a statement, verified by bis oath, of all tbe real and personal property, moneys, credits, investments in bonds, joint-stock companies, annuities, or otherwise, and tbe value of improvements on real estate since same was assessed, in his possession or under his control on the first day of May (italics ours), either as owner or bolder thereof, or as parent, guardian, trustee, executor, executrix, administrator, administratrix, receiver, accounting officer, partner, agent, factor, or otherwise.” (Tbe provisos of tbis section are not material for tbe decision of tbis case.) Public Laws 1921, cb. 38, sec. 30. Hyatt v. Walston, 174 N. C., 55; 37 Cyc., 788.

Section 33 of tbe act, supra, provides: "Where personal ■ property shall be listed. Section 38 of tbe act, supra, provides that tbe taxpayer shall take an oath that tbe property listed “is a full, true and complete list of all and each kind of property owned by me,” . . . “and that I have not neglected to list for taxation for tbe year all of each and every kind of property of wbicb I am tbe owner,” etc.

“If any person liable to be charged with taxes shall wilfully refuse to answer any questions respecting bis property, or refuse to file, sign, and swear to bis returns, be shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction liable to be punished by a fine not exceeding fifty dollars, or imprisonment not exceeding thirty days, or both; and it shall be tbe duty of tbe assessors or list-taker to have tbe offender prosecuted; and tbe list-taker shall complete tbe list from tbe best information be can obtain. Every list-taker and chairman of tbe board of county commissioners shall have power to send for persons and papers, and to examine witnesses and administer oaths.”’ Public Laws 1921, cb. 38, sec. 71. (Same provision in Public Laws 1923, cb. 12, sec. 65.)
“Taxes shall not be a lien upon personal property, except where otherwise provided by law, but from a levy thereon (italics ours) : Provided, that no mortgage or deed of trust executed upon personal property shall have tbe effect of creating a lien thereon superior to tbe lien acquired by a subsequent levy upon said property for tbe payment of tbe State, county and municipal taxes assessed against tbe same; but tbe sheriff or other tax collector levying upon such property, for tbe purpose of *94 collecting tbe taxes due thereon, shall give due notice to the mortgagee or trustee of such property of the amount of such taxes at least ten days before the sale of the same, and such trustee or mortgagee shall have the right to pay said taxes and the costs incident to making the levy, when the sheriff or tax collector shall release the same to such trustee or mortgagee, and the amount so paid by said trustee or mortgagee shall constitute a part of the debt secured in the mortgage or deed of trust. O. S., sec. 1986.
“All persons who own property and willfully fail to list it within the time allowed before the list-taker or the board of commissioners shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and the failure to list shall be prima facie evidence that such failure was willful, and it shall be the duty of the board of commissioners to present to the grand jury the names of all such persons.”, Public Laws 1921, ch. 38, sec. 82. (Same provision in Public Laws 1923, ch. 12, sec. 75.)
“The lien of the State, county, and municipal taxes levied for any and all purposes in each year shall attach to all real estate of the taxpayer situated within the county or other municipality by which the tax list is placed in the sheriff’s hands, which lien shall attach on the first day of June, annually, and shall continue until such taxes, with any penalty and costs which shall accrue thereon, shall be paid.” C. S., sec. 7987.
■ “The lien for taxes levied -for any and all purposes in each year shall attach to all the real estate of the taxpayers within the city on the first day of May, annually, and shall continue until such taxes, with any penalty and costs which shall accrue thereon, shall be paid. Bui there shall he no lien for taxes on the personal property of the taxpayer hut from a levy thereon(Italics ours.) O. S., sec. 2815.

The plaintiffs pursued the lawful and correct remedy by conforming strictly to the statute, paying the money under protest and suing to recover same. C. S., sec. 7979.

There is an old saying that there are only two things certain on this earth — “taxes and death.” It is impossible to escape either.

Every citizen has to aid in supporting the government under which he lives, and this cannot be done without taxes. The burden should be borne equally by all, and all public officials, whose duty it’ is to do so, shall expend same legally, with economy and efficiency. Taxes have priority over homestead and personal property exemptions. There is no lien on personal property for taxes but from a levy thereon. Shelby v. Tiddy, 118 N. C., 792; Wilmington v. Sprunt, 114 N. C., 310.

Const., Art. Y, sec. 3, exempts certain notes, mortgages, etc., given in good faith for purchase price of a home, when purchase price does not exceed $3,000, and when notes, mortgages, etc., to run for not less *95 than five or more than twenty years, provided the interest on notes, mortgages, etc., does not exceed 5% per cent. Exemptions allowed on incomes; married man and wife, living together; widow or widower having minor child or children, natural or adopted, not less than $2,000. All other persons not less than $1,000, and there may be allowed other deductions (not including living expenses), so that only net incomes are taxed. The rate of tax on incomes shall not exceed 6 per cent.

The Constitution allows certain property to be exempt from taxation. “Property belonging to the State, or to municipal corporations, shall be exempt from taxation. The General Assembly may exempt cemeteries and property held for educational, scientific, literary, charitable or religious purposes; also wearing apparel, arms for muster, household and kitchen furniture, the mechanical and agricultural implements' of mechanics and farmers, libraries and sciéntific instruments, or any other personal property, to a value not exceeding three hundred dollars.” Const., Art. Y, sec. 5.

“The list shall be given by the person charged during the months of May and June, as herein described.” (Proviso not quoted.) Public Laws 1921, ch. 38, sec. 31.

The board of county commissioners and governing body of any municipal corporation are given power to enter or list.real or personal property and add 25 per cent to same for each year unlisted- — for five back years in which the property was not listed. Laws 1921, ch. 38, secs. 81 and 82. (Laws 1923, ch. 12, secs. 74 and 75, have practically the same provisions.)

From the facts agreed, on the first day of May, 1922, and prior thereto, Mrs. M. W. Oahoon owned a stock of merchandise and store fixtures in Plymouth, N. C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reeves Brothers, Inc. v. Town of Rutherfordton
190 S.E.2d 345 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Town of Asheboro v. Morris
193 S.E. 424 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Currie v. Southern Manufacturers Club, Inc.
185 S.E. 666 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Henderson Building & Loan Ass'n v. Burwell
174 S.E. 125 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
State v. . Floyd
168 S.E. 222 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Dillard v. . Walker
167 S.E. 632 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Reynolds v. . Asheville
154 S.E. 85 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Reynolds v. City of Asheville
154 S.E. 85 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Henrietta Mills v. Rutherford Co.
281 U.S. 121 (Supreme Court, 1930)
Henrietta Mills v. Rutherford County
281 U.S. 121 (Supreme Court, 1930)
Reichland Shale Products Co. v. Southern Steel & Cement Co.
156 S.E. 777 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Bond v. Town of Tarboro
136 S.E. 713 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Williamson
132 S.E. 146 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
New Hanover County v. . Whiteman
129 S.E. 808 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 S.E. 905, 186 N.C. 90, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carstarphen-v-town-of-plymouth-nc-1923.