Carstarphen v. Jones
This text of 67 So. 177 (Carstarphen v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The record shows that several witnesses testified orally upon the merits of this case. The.- testimony of these. witnesses is not in the record. The chancellor heard this evidence, and this evidence may have justified his finding, and, as the evidence “is not before us, we are therefore not able to judge of its effect. It may have been controlling with the chancellor.” Wilson v. Brown, 94 Miss. 608, 47 So. 545.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 So. 177, 108 Miss. 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carstarphen-v-jones-miss-1914.