Carson v. Williams

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 27, 2009
Docket08-8523
StatusUnpublished

This text of Carson v. Williams (Carson v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carson v. Williams, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8523

TYRONE CARSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KEVIN WILLIAMS; CURTIS BUFFORD, official and individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:08-cv-03527-PMD)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Carson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Carson appeals the district court’s order and

judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and dismissing without prejudice Carson’s complaint. Because

Carson did not file objections to the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation, he waived his right to appeal. United

States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.
727 F.2d 91 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carson v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carson-v-williams-ca4-2009.