Carson v. State
395 So. 2d 229, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19629
Opinion
We affirm on the grounds that the evidence of appellant’s use of a firearm in the commission of a criminal offense properly went to the jury; Styles v. State, 384 So.2d 703 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Machado v. State, 363 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 373 So.2d 459 (Fla.1979); Warren v. State, 332 So.2d 361 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); and that the state’s identification testimony properly survived appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. Zuberi v. State, 343 So.2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 354 So.2d 988 (Fla.1977).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carson v. State, 395 So. 2d 229, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19629 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
395 So. 2d 229 (Carson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MacHado v. State
363 So. 2d 1132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Warren v. State
332 So. 2d 361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Zuberi v. State
343 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Styles v. State
384 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)