Carson v. State
This text of 395 So. 2d 229 (Carson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm on the grounds that the evidence of appellant’s use of a firearm in the commission of a criminal offense properly went to the jury; Styles v. State, 384 So.2d 703 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Machado v. State, 363 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 373 So.2d 459 (Fla.1979); Warren v. State, 332 So.2d 361 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); and that the state’s identification testimony properly survived appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. Zuberi v. State, 343 So.2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 354 So.2d 988 (Fla.1977).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
395 So. 2d 229, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carson-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.