Carson v. Mills

304 P.2d 712, 49 Wash. 2d 597, 1956 Wash. LEXIS 318
Washington Supreme Court·Decided December 6, 1956·No. 33782·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover possession of personal property or the value thereof, and damages for its detention.

The trial court found, from conflicting evidence, that the plaintiffs had not sustained the burden of proof, and dismissed the action. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The appellants assign error only to the court’s findings of fact Nos. 2 and 3 and contend that the evidence adduced preponderates against these findings. Our reading of the record discloses that on all essential issues there was a sharp conflict between the testimony of the appellants and the respondent. The evidence was circumstantial as to the taking, damaging, or withholding of the property.

We have held that, where a trial court’s determination of an issue hinges primarily upon the credibility of the evidence, it will not be disturbed on appeal. Unosawa v. Wright, 44 Wn. (2d) 777, 778, 270 P. (2d) 975 (1954), and cases cited. We are convinced that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court’s findings.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carson v. Mills, 304 P.2d 712, 49 Wash. 2d 597, 1956 Wash. LEXIS 318 (Wash. 1956).

304 P.2d 712 (Carson v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zobrist v. Culp
611 P.2d 1330 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1980)
Sudduth v. Chapman
559 P.2d 1351 (Washington Supreme Court, 1977)
Rognrust v. Seto
467 P.2d 204 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1970)