Carson v. Law
19 S.C. Eq. 296
This text of 19 S.C. Eq. 296 (Carson v. Law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carson v. Law, 19 S.C. Eq. 296 (S.C. Ct. App. 1845).
Opinions
This court concurs with the Chancellor, in the result of his decree, upon the merits of the case.
It appears the Chancellor misconceived the counsel with regard to the costs. But for this misapprehension they would have been allowed to follow the decree.
It is therefore ordered that the decree be affirmed; and that the defendants pay the costs,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 S.C. Eq. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carson-v-law-scctapp-1845.