Carson v. Gaineswood Condominiums

550 So. 2d 146, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2408, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5776, 1989 WL 120485
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 13, 1989
DocketNo. 89-407
StatusPublished

This text of 550 So. 2d 146 (Carson v. Gaineswood Condominiums) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carson v. Gaineswood Condominiums, 550 So. 2d 146, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2408, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5776, 1989 WL 120485 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Michael Carson appeals a workers’ compensation order denying his claim for permanent disability benefits. He sustained a back injury on July 17, 1977, during the course and scope of his employment with Gaineswood Condominiums. The facts are set forth in Carson v. Gaineswood Condominiums and State Farm Insurance Company, 532 So.2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), wherein we remanded for additional findings of fact concerning claimant’s impairment and disability. On remand, the judge issued the order now before us.

The record, as well as this court’s prior opinion, indicates that claimant has suffered from certain psychiatric difficulties, including depression, aggravated by the industrial injury. In his order, the judge stated:

15. The undersigned has also relied upon the medical testimony that the claimant has been given a one hundred percent service connected disability because of psychiatric condition. (R 50, 399, 654, 659).

(R 980). We note, however, that the order contains no findings~“wittr regard to the aggravation of claimant’s psychiatric condition by the compensable physical injury, and the resulting disability, if any, due to such aggravation. Therefore, we reverse and remand for further findings on this issue. Because the order does not effectively dispose of all issues bearing on the extent of claimant’s disability, we do not consider the sufficiency of the remaining findings of fact related to claimant’s physical injury at this time.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ERVIN and ZEHMER, JJ., concur. NIMMONS, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carson v. Gaineswood Condominiums
532 So. 2d 28 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
550 So. 2d 146, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2408, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5776, 1989 WL 120485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carson-v-gaineswood-condominiums-fladistctapp-1989.