Carson v. Bunn
This text of 109 P. 797 (Carson v. Bunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action to recover damages for breach of an oral contract for a year’s services to commence at a future day. The court below held that the contract was nonenforceable under the statute of frauds, and entered a judgment of dismissal, from which this appeal is prosecuted.
The judgment of dismissal awarded costs against the appellants in the sum of $22, and the appeal bond is in the sum of $200, conditioned both as a cost and as a supersedeas bond. The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no sufficient appeal bond was filed, and under repeated rulings of this court the motion must be granted. Hassett v. Fraternal Brotherhood, ante p. 161, 109 Pac. 305, and cases there cited. Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 P. 797, 59 Wash. 266, 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carson-v-bunn-wash-1910.