Carson v. Ambrose

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Carson v. Ambrose

38 A. 508, 183 Pa. 88, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 717

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 25, 1897·No. Appeal, No. 37·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pek Curiam,

No sufficient reason'for setting aside the sheriff’s sale in this case has been shown either in the court below or here. The ■discretion vested in the court was wisely exercised in discharging the rule to show cause. There is nothing in either of the specifications of error that would justify a reversal or modification of the decree.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pek Curiam,

No sufficient reason'for setting aside the sheriff’s sale in this case has been shown either in the court below or here. The ■discretion vested in the court was wisely exercised in discharging the rule to show cause. There is nothing in either of the specifications of error that would justify a reversal or modification of the decree.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Carson v. Ambrose, 38 A. 508, 183 Pa. 88, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 717 (Pa. 1897).

Pincite

38 A. 508 (Carson v. Ambrose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related