Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.
240 F.3d 841, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1647, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1307, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2001·No. Nos. 98-55056, 98-55210, 98-55213, 98-55215 and 98-55422·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp., 240 F.3d 841, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1647, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1307, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100 (9th Cir. 2001).
240 F.3d 841 (Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corporation
240 F.3d 841 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)