Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.
240 F.3d 841, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1647, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1307, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 2001
DocketNos. 98-55056, 98-55210, 98-55213, 98-55215 and 98-55422
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 240 F.3d 841 (Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp., 240 F.3d 841, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1647, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1307, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100 (9th Cir. 2001).
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corporation
240 F.3d 841 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
240 F.3d 841, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1647, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1307, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carson-harbor-village-ltd-v-unocal-corp-ca9-2001.