Carson City v. The Travelers Indemity Company

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided February 22, 2022·No. 3:22-cv-00006·Unknown

Opinion

Nevada Bar No. 010622 (Pro Hac Vice) (Pro Hac Vice) 7450 Arroyo Crossing Parkway, Suite 250 Las Vegas, NV 89113 Tel: (702) 479-4350 Fax: (702) 270-4602 tfhunter@travelers.com Attorney for Defendant, INDEMNITY COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA CARSON CITY, a consolidated municipality CASE NO.: 3:22-cv-00006 LRH-CLB and political subdivision of the State of Nevada, STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE Plaintiff, ORDER –CONFIDENTIAL vs. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Connecticut Corporation, ROE COMPANIES I-X, and DOE INDIVIDUALS Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff CARSON CITY, a consolidated municipality and political subdivision of the State of Nevada (“Plaintiff” or “Carson City”) and defendant THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Connecticut Corporation (“Defendant” or “Travelers”) (collectively, the “Parties”) through their respective undersigned counsel, that the following terms and conditions of the Stipulated Confidentiality and Protective Order (the “Order”) shall govern the handling of documents, things, depositions and deposition exhibits, written discovery responses, testimony, portion(s) of any of these things, and any other information produced, given, or exchanged between any party to this case and any other party or non-parties in the above-referenced action (collectively, the Definitions In this Stipulation and Protective Order, the words set forth below shall have the following meanings: “Proceeding” means the above-entitled proceeding Case No. 3:22-cv-00006 “Court” means the United States District Judge Larry R. Hicks, the United States Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin, or any other judge to which this Proceeding may be assigned, including Court staff participating in such proceedings. “Confidential” means any Material: (a) containing or reflecting trade secrets or proprietary, commercial, financial, technical, competitively sensitive, or other business information or data; (b) containing personal/private information; (c) containing information received in confidence; or (d) which the Designating Party otherwise believes in good faith to be entitled to protection t under applicable law. “Confidential Materials” means any written discovery responses, Documents, Testimony or Information as defined below designated as “Confidential” pursuant to the provisions of this Stipulation and Protective Order. “Designating Party” means the Party that designates Materials as “Confidential.” “Disclose” or “Disclosed” or “Disclosure” means to reveal, divulge, give, or make available Materials, or any part thereof, or any information contained therein. “Documents” means (i) any “Writings,” and “Recordings” as those terms are defined by Nevada Revised Statutes 52.225, which have been produced in discovery in this Proceeding by any person, and (ii) any copies, reproductions, or summaries of all or any part of the foregoing. “Information” means the content of Documents or Testimony. “Testimony” means all depositions, declarations or other testimony taken or used in this Proceeding. Confidential Materials The Designating Party shall have the right to designate as “Confidential” any written discovery responses, Documents, Testimony or Information that the Designating Party in good faith believes to contain non-public information that is entitled to confidential treatment under applicable law. a. Without limiting the forgoing and by way of example only, Confidential Materials shall include but is not limited to: confidential insurance policy, underwriting and claims information, including but not limited to confidential information on pricing and policy formulation, premium calculations, and claim manuals; business and accounting records relating to profit and loss statements, including but not limited to payroll, tax, revenue, income, equipment, transaction, and other financial data; and confidential information contained in personnel files, including information regarding salary and compensation; financial information, trade secrets, and private or personal information of any party’s or third-party’s customers; and information that otherwise meets the standards for protection set forth in the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure. b. The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Protective Order cover not only Confidential Materials (as defined above), but also (i) any information copied or extracted from Confidential Materials; (ii) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Confidential Materials; and (iii) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their counsel that might reveal Confidential Materials. The entry of this Stipulation and Protective Order does not alter, waive, modify, or abridge any right, privilege or protection otherwise available to any Party with respect to the discovery of matters, including but not limited to any Party’s right to assert the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, or other privileges, or any Party’s right to contest any such assertion. Any Documents, Testimony or Information to be designated as “Confidential” must be clearly so designated before the Document, Testimony or Information is Disclosed or “Confidential” designation. The “Confidential” designation should not obscure or interfere with the legibility of the designated Information. a. For Documents (apart from transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), the Designating Party must affix the legend “Confidential” on each page of any Document containing such designated Confidential Material. b. For Testimony given in depositions the Designating Party may either: i. identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, all “Confidential” Testimony, by specifying all portions of the Testimony that qualify as “Confidential;” or ii. designate the entirety of the Testimony at the deposition as “Confidential” (before the deposition is concluded) with the right to identify more specific portions of the Testimony as to which protection is sought within 30 days following receipt of the deposition transcript. In circumstances where portions of the deposition Testimony are designated for protection, the transcript pages containing “Confidential” Information may be separately bound by the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each page the legend “Confidential,” as instructed by the Designating Party. For Information produced in some form other than Documents, and for any other tangible items, including, without limitation, compact discs or DVDs, the Designating Party must affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the Information or item is stored the legend “Confidential.” If only portions of the Information or item warrant protection, the Designating Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the “Confidential” portions. The inadvertent production by any of the undersigned Parties or non-Parties to the Proceedings of any Document, Testimony or Information during discovery in this Proceeding without a “Confidential” designation, shall be without prejudice to any claim that such item is “Confidential” and such Party shall not be held to have waived any rights by such inadvertent “Confidential” designation is inadvertently produced without such designation, the Party that inadvertently produced the document shall give written notice of such inadvertent production within twenty (20) days of discovery of the inadvertent production, together with a further copy of the subject Document, Testimony or Information designated as “Confidential” (the “Inadvertent Production Notice”). Upon receipt of such Inadvertent Production Notice, the Party that received the inadvertently produced Document, Testimony or Information shall promptly destroy the inadvertently produced Document, Testimony or Information and all copies thereof, or, at the expense of the producing Party, return such together with all copies of such

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carson City v. The Travelers Indemity Company, (D. Nev. 2022).

Carson City v. The Travelers Indemity Company (Carson City v. The Travelers Indemity Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)