Carruthers v. State
This text of 972 So. 2d 1035 (Carruthers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joseph CARRUTHERS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, Margaret Good-Earnest and John Pauly, Jr., Assistant. Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, and Joseph Caruthers, Sanderson, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sue-Ellen Kenny, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. In this appeal pursuant to Anders,[1] Defendant's pro se briefs raise issues of involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by his pro se rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to his right to assert them in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief.
SHAHOOD, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
972 So. 2d 1035, 2008 WL 141096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carruthers-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.