Carruthers v. Kroger (Ballot Title Certified)
This text of Carruthers v. Kroger (Ballot Title Certified) (Carruthers v. Kroger (Ballot Title Certified)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS
BALLOT TITLE CERTIFIED
July 9, 2009
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057317). Upon consideration by the court. Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 36 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057321). Upon consideration by the court. Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 41 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure. Respondent's motion to strike is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carruthers v. Kroger (Ballot Title Certified), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carruthers-v-kroger-ballot-title-certified-or-2009.