Carruth v. Grassie

77 Mass. 211
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1858
StatusPublished

This text of 77 Mass. 211 (Carruth v. Grassie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carruth v. Grassie, 77 Mass. 211 (Mass. 1858).

Opinion

Shaw, C. J.

The object and purpose of the statute are to secure certain articles necessary to the well-being and sustenance of the debtor, his wife and family, from being taken on execution for debt. "When a right is granted, either by an individual, or by a statute, the means of securing the right are aise [212]*212granted by implication. If it were necessary to the exemption that the animal should be actually giving milk at the time, then almost any cow must be liable to be taken on execution at some time of the year. The court are of opinion that if the debtor has honestly taken a heifer calf with the expectation and purpose of keeping her for a cow, she is within the true and equitable meaning of the statute. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 Mass. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carruth-v-grassie-mass-1858.