Carrubba v. Moskowitz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Carrubba v. Moskowitz

847 A.2d 310, 268 Conn. 916, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 147

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMarch 24, 2004

DocketSC 17157

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 847 A.2d 310 (Carrubba v. Moskowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carrubba v. Moskowitz, 847 A.2d 310, 268 Conn. 916, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 147 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 81 Conn. App. 382 (AC 22962), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to qualified immunity?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring this legal malpractice action against the defendant?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 81 Conn. App. 382 (AC 22962), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to qualified immunity?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring this legal malpractice action against the defendant?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

847 A.2d 310, 268 Conn. 916, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrubba-v-moskowitz-conn-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack