Carrozza v. Greenbaum
882 A.2d 1000, 584 Pa. 154, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1709
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 12, 2005
DocketPetition 134-137 EAL 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 882 A.2d 1000 (Carrozza v. Greenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carrozza v. Greenbaum, 882 A.2d 1000, 584 Pa. 154, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1709 (Pa. 2005).
Opinion
*155 ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of August 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted limited to:
Where two defendants are found jointly and severally liable, one defendant has sufficient insurance coverage to satisfy the entire judgment, and the other defendant’s insurer is insolvent, may a court direct the judgment creditor to seek satisfaction exclusively from the solvent insurer, thus effectively discharging the Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association of all liability?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Winschel v. Jain
925 A.2d 782 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)
Carrozza v. Greenbaum
916 A.2d 553 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
882 A.2d 1000, 584 Pa. 154, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrozza-v-greenbaum-pa-2005.