Carrozza v. Greenbaum

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Carrozza v. Greenbaum

882 A.2d 1000, 584 Pa. 154, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1709

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 12, 2005·No. Petition 134-137 EAL 2005·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*155 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of August 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted limited to:

Where two defendants are found jointly and severally liable, one defendant has sufficient insurance coverage to satisfy the entire judgment, and the other defendant’s insurer is insolvent, may a court direct the judgment creditor to seek satisfaction exclusively from the solvent insurer, thus effectively discharging the Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association of all liability?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*155 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of August 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted limited to:

Where two defendants are found jointly and severally liable, one defendant has sufficient insurance coverage to satisfy the entire judgment, and the other defendant’s insurer is insolvent, may a court direct the judgment creditor to seek satisfaction exclusively from the solvent insurer, thus effectively discharging the Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association of all liability?

Carrozza v. Greenbaum, 882 A.2d 1000, 584 Pa. 154, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1709 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

882 A.2d 1000 (Carrozza v. Greenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related