Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Johnson & Cravens, 13911, Inc.
867 F.2d 1517
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 20, 1989·No. No. 87-1835·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We grant the appellee’s motion to clarify our decision in this case, 858 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir.1988), to the following extent. The sentence that reads:
In Bean v. Independent American Savings Association, [838 F.2d 739 (5 Cir.1988)] this court acknowledged that the proviso in section 1730(k)(l) is an exception to the FSLIC’s otherwise exclusive jurisdiction to resolve claims against the FSLIC as receiver for a failed savings and loan association.1
is now modified to read:
In Bean v. Independent American Savings Association, this court acknowledged that the proviso in section 1730(k)(l) is an exception to the jurisdictional grant contained in that statute.
This court has no desire to enter a jurisdictional thicket that does not lie in the center of its path.
MOTION GRANTED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Johnson & Cravens, 13911, Inc., 867 F.2d 1517 (5th Cir. 1989).
867 F.2d 1517 (Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Johnson & Cravens, 13911, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Johnson & Cravens
867 F.2d 1517 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)