Carroll v. Warden

159 A.2d 851, 222 Md. 618
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided September 1, 1993·No. [P.C. No. 93, September Term, 1959.]·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

222 Md. 618 (1960)
159 A.2d 851

CARROLL
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[P.C. No. 93, September Term, 1959.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 18, 1960.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND and HORNEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner's contentions deal mainly with the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to convict, which is not a ground for post conviction relief. Banks v. Warden, 221 Md. 592, 155 A.2d 697. Although he complains that he was not given a transcript of the testimony of his original trial, there is no allegation that he either requested such a transcript or that he sought an appeal and was prevented from perfecting it as a result of being denied the transcript, or otherwise. His application to the lower court shows no grounds for relief under *619 the Post Conviction Procedure Act, and his application for leave to appeal is denied.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carroll v. Warden, 159 A.2d 851, 222 Md. 618 (Md. 1993).

159 A.2d 851 (Carroll v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Warden
169 A.2d 444 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1961)
Ellinger v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
167 A.2d 334 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1961)
Scott v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
164 A.2d 270 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1960)