Carroll v. Toplitz

27 Misc. 833, 60 N.Y.S. 1134
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedMay 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Misc. 833 (Carroll v. Toplitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carroll v. Toplitz, 27 Misc. 833, 60 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

This case was fairly and, we think:, properly-submitted to the jury.

Upon the question which the jury were to and did pass on, we find no ground for any claim that they have found through prejudice, sympathy or passion arid, therefore, unless there is clearly some error of law, we cannot and will not- disturb the-verdict of the juiy.

It is true that many objections have been taken during the trial, but we do not, after careful examination, find reasonable error.

Oloott, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Misc. 833, 60 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-toplitz-nynyccityct-1899.