Carroll v. Toplitz
This text of 27 Misc. 833 (Carroll v. Toplitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was fairly and, we think:, properly-submitted to the jury.
Upon the question which the jury were to and did pass on, we find no ground for any claim that they have found through prejudice, sympathy or passion arid, therefore, unless there is clearly some error of law, we cannot and will not- disturb the-verdict of the juiy.
It is true that many objections have been taken during the trial, but we do not, after careful examination, find reasonable error.
Oloott, J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 Misc. 833, 60 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-toplitz-nynyccityct-1899.