Carroll v. Superintendent, Maryland Correctional Institution

257 A.2d 454, 8 Md. App. 24, 1969 Md. App. LEXIS 249
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 15, 1969·No. No. 78·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an application for leave to appeal by Thomas D. Carroll from an order of Judge George D. Solter presiding in the Criminal Court of Baltimore denying relief prayed in applicant’s first petition under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act. The application for leave to appeal is granted, and the case is remanded for the granting of a belated appeal. At the hearing below, applicant’s trial counsel admitted that he had not advised applicant of his right to appeal since, in his opinion, there was absolutely no basis for an appeal.

The failure of appointed counsel to advise applicant of his right to appeal is a violation of Maryland Rule 719 b 6 (effective September 1, 1967), which violation requires us to award applicant a belated appeal. For a full discussion of the issue see Rhodes v. Warden, 7 Md. App. 423, 256 A.2d 351. The case of Webster v. Warden, 6 Md. App. 127, 250 A. 2d 299, which is cited in the hearing judge’s memorandum opinion, applies only to the leave to appeal after a post conviction proceeding and not to a direct appeal after an original trial.

Application for leave to appeal granted, and applicant awarded a belated appeal; case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carroll v. Superintendent, Maryland Correctional Institution, 257 A.2d 454, 8 Md. App. 24, 1969 Md. App. LEXIS 249 (Md. Ct. App. 1969).

257 A.2d 454 (Carroll v. Superintendent, Maryland Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucas v. Warden
270 A.2d 330 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1970)