Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Carroll v. State

Carroll v. State

254 S.W.3d 912, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 770, 2008 WL 2346103
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 10, 2008
DocketED 89859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 S.W.3d 912 (Carroll v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carroll v. State, 254 S.W.3d 912, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 770, 2008 WL 2346103 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Brion Carroll, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to properly cross-examine a witness.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Witherspoon v. State
254 S.W.3d 912 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 S.W.3d 912, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 770, 2008 WL 2346103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-state-moctapp-2008.