Carroll v. State

872 So. 2d 1014, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7001, 2004 WL 1103335
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carroll v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 914 So. 2d 1014
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 2004·No. No. 4D00-3368·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court erred in re-sentencing appellant in his absence and without counsel, and further erred in using an incorrect scoresheet to re-sentence him, we reverse and remand for re-sentencing with a corrected scoresheet, at a hearing at which he is present and represented by counsel.

GUNTHER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carroll v. State, 872 So. 2d 1014, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7001, 2004 WL 1103335 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

872 So. 2d 1014 (Carroll v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.