Carroll v. State
872 So. 2d 1014, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7001, 2004 WL 1103335
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carroll v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 914 So. 2d 1014 →
Opinion
Because the trial court erred in re-sentencing appellant in his absence and without counsel, and further erred in using an incorrect scoresheet to re-sentence him, we reverse and remand for re-sentencing with a corrected scoresheet, at a hearing at which he is present and represented by counsel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carroll v. State, 872 So. 2d 1014, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7001, 2004 WL 1103335 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
872 So. 2d 1014 (Carroll v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.