Carroll v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carroll v. State

752 So. 2d 726, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2794, 2000 WL 276472

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 2000

DocketNo. 3D99-3073

StatusPublished

This text of 752 So. 2d 726 (Carroll v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carroll v. State, 752 So. 2d 726, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2794, 2000 WL 276472 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Aloysrous Carroll appeals an order striking his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 on the ground that the motion had not been sworn to. The State concedes that the trial court was in error on this issue because the appellant had, in fact, executed an unnotarized oath. However, on the merits, the record (including particularly the plea colloquy) conclusively refutes appellant’s claims.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Aloysrous Carroll appeals an order striking his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 on the ground that the motion had not been sworn to. The State concedes that the trial court was in error on this issue because the appellant had, in fact, executed an unnotarized oath. However, on the merits, the record (including particularly the plea colloquy) conclusively refutes appellant’s claims.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

752 So. 2d 726, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2794, 2000 WL 276472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.