Carroll v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Carroll v. State

121 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 614

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 9, 1929·No. 7 Div. 408.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

There was a general verdict by the jury of guilty as charged in the indictment. The indictment in the first count charged the defendant with distilling, making, or manufacturing prohibited liquors, naming them; and in the second count he was charged with the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to-be used for that purpose. The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. Upon examination we find the record regular in all things and without error. The judgment of conviction, from which this appeal was taken, Will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

There was a general verdict by the jury of guilty as charged in the indictment. The indictment in the first count charged the defendant with distilling, making, or manufacturing prohibited liquors, naming them; and in the second count he was charged with the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to-be used for that purpose. The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. Upon examination we find the record regular in all things and without error. The judgment of conviction, from which this appeal was taken, Will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Carroll v. State, 121 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 614 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

121 So. 920 (Carroll v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.