Carroll v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Carroll v. State

121 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 614

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 9, 1929

Docket7 Div. 408.

StatusPublished

This text of 121 So. 920 (Carroll v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carroll v. State, 121 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 614 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

There was a general verdict by the jury of guilty as charged in the indictment. The indictment in the first count charged the defendant with distilling, making, or manufacturing prohibited liquors, naming them; and in the second count he was charged with the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to-be used for that purpose. The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. Upon examination we find the record regular in all things and without error. The judgment of conviction, from which this appeal was taken, Will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

There was a general verdict by the jury of guilty as charged in the indictment. The indictment in the first count charged the defendant with distilling, making, or manufacturing prohibited liquors, naming them; and in the second count he was charged with the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to-be used for that purpose. The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. Upon examination we find the record regular in all things and without error. The judgment of conviction, from which this appeal was taken, Will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-state-alactapp-1929.