Carroll v. South Florida Water Management District

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carroll v. South Florida Water Management District

667 So. 2d 216, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8259, 1995 WL 457245

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 4, 1995

DocketNo. 94-4075

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 667 So. 2d 216 (Carroll v. South Florida Water Management District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carroll v. South Florida Water Management District, 667 So. 2d 216, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8259, 1995 WL 457245 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Aaron Carroll, appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (“JCC”) denying his claim for wage loss benefits based upon his failure to conduct an adequate and good faith job search. Appel-lees, South Florida Management District and Crawford & Company, concede that the JCC erred in denying wage loss benefits for the August 20, 1993, through September 2, 1993, biweekly period because the appellant commenced work on August 24, 1993, and there was no evidence that the appellant voluntarily limited his income in accepting that employment. Both parties further agree that appellant earned $132.50 during the second week of the biweekly period, rather than $72.50 as reported on the wage loss form. We have examined the remaining issues raised in the appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we reverse that part of the JCC’s order which denies wage loss benefits for the August 20,1993, through September 2,1993, period. The JCC’s order is affirmed in all other respects.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Aaron Carroll, appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (“JCC”) denying his claim for wage loss benefits based upon his failure to conduct an adequate and good faith job search. Appel-lees, South Florida Management District and Crawford & Company, concede that the JCC erred in denying wage loss benefits for the August 20, 1993, through September 2, 1993, biweekly period because the appellant commenced work on August 24, 1993, and there was no evidence that the appellant voluntarily limited his income in accepting that employment. Both parties further agree that appellant earned $132.50 during the second week of the biweekly period, rather than $72.50 as reported on the wage loss form. We have examined the remaining issues raised in the appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we reverse that part of the JCC’s order which denies wage loss benefits for the August 20,1993, through September 2,1993, period. The JCC’s order is affirmed in all other respects.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 So. 2d 216, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8259, 1995 WL 457245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-south-florida-water-management-district-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack